The editor of the book Networked Public edited by Kazys
Varnellis and contributor writer Anne Friedberg directs our attention on page
16 and 17 to the theorist Jurgen Habermas in his writings of the early 18th
century describes how people gathered in café’s or coffeehouse’s in Europe to
discuss the gossip but more importantly the news media of the day. Through
distribution of pamphlets which is the vehicle Thomas Paine in the 1760 and
1770s printed himself in his spare time and distributed copies of his famous
publication “Common Sense” throughout the city of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
which inspired America’s founding fathers to fight for freedom. Mr. Paine
himself would congregate with others in coffeehouses mostly gin mills or pubs
and debate the arguments of the times. I mention Paine as one of many examples that we must look back
at history in order to learn how information is acquired and transmitted,
during this era information was communicated through the printing of broadsheets—a
publishing term for a newspaper printed (wide sheet) and an example is the New
York Times. NOTE: Thomas Paine has had an effect on my reading and writing
during my undergraduate work at SUNY Sullivan and Empire how the printed word
can influence others in open discussions both online classes and social media.
I ask the question: How did an 18th century
theorists Jurgen Habermas foresee the future how people would gather in public
spaces? Some 300 years later since his writings people converge in coffeehouses
around the world and gather in isolation (hyper-individualism) using cell phones
and laptop computers. Finally, I’m looking forward further into the 21st
century how people will communicate by electronic means.
SIDEBAR: I prefer to speak to others in person either in
person or phone.
My reference dropped off with cut and paste from word document:
ReplyDeleteVarnelis, K.(2008).Networked Publics
http://site.ebrary.com.library.esc.edu/lib/empire/reader.action?docID=10251680
The discussion in the text on coffeehouses was absolutely the most interesting aspect of the reading for me. This idea of gathering in isolation, to feel anonymous and at the same time to be a part of something is very interesting. With the addition of cell phones and computer laptops are we even truly in the coffeehouse anymore? Where are we? I suppose as we look further into the 21st century it will be interesting to see how the coffeehouse changes and remains the same as networked publics constantly change with technological advances constantly growing and changing.
ReplyDelete